When the Mask Becomes the Face

On ego-syntonic lives, character formation, and the courage to become real

There is a particular kind of captivity that rarely looks like one.

It doesn’t announce itself as dysfunction or disorder. It presents as competence. Charisma. Faithfulness. Even goodness. From the outside, it might even look like maturity. From the inside, it feels…normal. Unquestioned. Right.

Psychology calls this an ego-syntonic state—when our patterns, defenses, and adaptations feel so aligned with who we think we are that they don’t register as problems at all. They are not experienced as masks. They are experienced as me.

And that is precisely the danger of this particular captivity.

When adaptation hardens into identity

Most of us learned early how to survive: how to be liked, respected, safe, admired, or needed. These strategies were not wrong. They were often brilliant. They helped us navigate families, churches, classrooms, and systems that rewarded certain ways of being and discouraged others.

But over time, what began as adaptation can slowly calcify into identity.

Thomas Merton wrote often about the ways we confuse our constructed selves with our true selves—not because we are deceitful, but because we are habituated. We learn to live outwardly, in a kind of virtual reality, curated by expectations, roles, and applause. Eventually, we no longer experience this outward-facing life as something we wear.

It simply becomes the only face we know.

This is what makes ego-syntonic states so difficult to interrupt. There is no internal friction. No alarm. No felt sense that something is amiss. The mask fits perfectly because it has been worn for decades.

In character formation work, the problem we often run into is this: We try to improve the mask. We offer better habits, better theology, better disciplines. We apply spiritual Band-Aids to a persona that was never meant to carry the weight of a human life. And we unwittingly collude with the mask.

A lack of self-awareness is not neutral

The problem is not that someone lives from a constructed identity. We all do, to some degree. The problem is what happens when that identity goes unexamined.

Lack of self-awareness is never contained. It spills.

When a person is fused to their persona—especially a competent, charismatic, or morally impressive one—they lose access to the parts of themselves that don’t fit the image. Shame gets buried. Anger goes underground. Fear disguises itself as certainty. Fragility masquerades as conviction.

Cole Arthur Riley writes:

“A great deal of injustice survives by self-ignorance. When you are poorly attuned to your own selfhood, it is easy to remain in denial about what fears, pain, and desires lead you to perpetuate suffering in the world, even your own. Reclaim practices of self-encounter.”

Consider briefly the story of Jason.

Jason was a gifted non-profit leader. A charismatic communicator. A visionary leader. People felt energized around him. The face he wore—confident, articulate, spiritually assured—was compelling and sincere as far as anyone could tell.

But that face also did important concealment work.

Beneath it lived unprocessed rage. Beneath it lived a deep shame he could not name, only outrun. Because these parts of him were never integrated, they leaked out sideways—through dismissiveness toward dissent from his Board, spiritualized control, and moments of relational cruelty he could neither see nor remember accurately.

Jason wasn’t pretending. That’s what made it so painful. His persona had become his operating system. And when the mask is mistaken for the self, anyone who threatens the mask feels like a threat to survival.

This is how character erodes not through scandal first, but through chronic unexamined disconnection.

The cultural wind at our backs

All of this unfolds within a cultural moment that actively rewards ego-syntonic living.

Late-stage capitalism thrives on competition and comparison. Worth is measured, ranked, and broadcast. Identity becomes something to secure, defend, and outperform rather than something to receive and inhabit. In such a climate, the persona is not merely tolerated—it is demanded.

We learn to market ourselves, brand our convictions, and curate our moral visibility. Empathy erodes not because people are naturally cruel, but because rivalry requires simplification. Neighbors are seen as competitors. Those who differ are viewed as threats. Love of neighbor is quietly displaced by ideological allegiance, where being right matters more than being present.

In this environment, the mask hardens faster. There is little space for interior reckoning, grief, or unlearning—only pressure to perform, position, and prevail. Character formation gives way to image-management, and the cost is borne not only by individuals, but by communities increasingly unable to recognize one another as human.

The slow work toward wholeness

The hope, of course, is that the mask is not the enemy.

What we often call a “false self” is better understood as a protective self—a loyal structure that once kept us safe, helped us belong, and gave us a place in the world. The work is not to destroy it, but to gently loosen our identification with it.

This is the work of differentiation.

Differentiation does not mean abandoning roles or stripping away competence. It means learning to say: This is how I learned to be—but it is not the whole of who I am.

It means developing the capacity to notice the inner division, something I wrote about in my book Wholeheartedness: Busyness, Exhaustion, and Healing the Divided Life. To feel grief for what was lost beneath the persona. To risk letting trusted others see us without the performance fully intact.

May Sarton captured this movement beautifully when she wrote:

Now I become myself. It’s taken

Time, many years and places;

I have been dissolved and shaken,

Worn other people’s faces.

“Now I become myself.” Not improve myself. Not fix myself. But by becoming myself—suggesting a slow, unfolding return rather than a dramatic reinvention—the kind of dramatic and performative reinvention late-stage capitalism demands.

In this sense, character formation is not primarily about behavior modification. It is about cultivating the conditions for deep, autonomic change—internal safety, reconnection, differentiation, self-compassion—all fueling habit change from the heart.

Tragically, when we remain fused to our persona, we inevitably ask others to collude with it. We recruit admiration, compliance, or reassurance to stabilize an identity that cannot bear scrutiny. But when we begin to separate from the mask—when we become more real—we become safer, to ourselves and to others.

Safer to be around. Safer to disagree with. Safer to love.

This is the paradox: the persona often looks impressive, but it is the integrated self that is trustworthy and sure. The mask may radiate, but it is your beautifully unhidden face that can bear the weight of responsibility, repentance, and repair.

And perhaps this is the deepest invitation of character formation—not to become someone else, but to finally become someone whole. To let the face we show the world be shaped not only by survival, but by truth.

The work is slow. Courageous. Often disorienting.

In a season in which we anticipate God’s incarnation in Jesus, the world is hungry for your incarnation too, dear friend. In a time when we’re hell-bent on virtual reality, my hope is that faces, once hidden, will once again “shine like stars” (Philip. 2:15).

And for each of us to be able to say, “Now I become myself.”

Reflection Questions

1. Where in my life has adaptation hardened into identity—parts of me that feel “natural” but might actually be long-worn patterns of protection, performance, or belonging? What signals (internal or relational) suggest it may be time to gently examine those places?

2. When I feel threatened, defensive, or overly certain, what might that reveal about a persona I’ve fused with? What emotions, needs, or memories might live beneath the mask I habitually present?

3. As I encounter others who may be living from an ego-syntonic identity, can I remain curious rather than reactive? What does it look like to offer presence, boundaries, and compassion without colluding with someone’s mask or attempting to forcibly remove it? What do I need for my own sense of safety as I do this?

---

Short pieces like this are almost always offered for free from me, but I am grateful to those of you who’ve become paid subscribers—because you know this work comes with a cost, in so many ways.

Please consider supporting writers you appreciate.

For many of us, this is a part of how we make a living—and your support inspires me, and others, to continue to write!